How they voted:
Member | July 2016 | December 2016 | January 2017 |
---|---|---|---|
Malarkey Amendment In recommendation 6, to remove the words: ‘War Memorial’ and to insert the words: ‘Sea Terminal’. |
Ashford Amendment In (ii) to remove the word ‘Broadway’ and insert the words ‘the Sea Terminal’ |
||
Catherine Ann CORLETT MHK |
n/a | AGAINST | ? |
Hon Christopher Charles THOMAS Esq MHK |
FOR |
AGAINST | ? |
What they promised:
House of Keys General Election 2016; responses given to Isle of Man Newspapers re future of horse trams. |
2016Manifesto |
|
---|---|---|
Catherine Ann CORLETT MHK |
"On the promenade - middle of the road – Sea Terminal to Strathallan." |
"I am not happy with the “shared space” scheme that, at some considerable cost, was put forward by the Department of Infrastructure as being the only way ahead for the promenade. If we wish to keep the Victorian flavour of the promenade the scheme as envisaged by the Department would be totally out of character. I believe that the plans for the Promenade could and should have been drawn up in-house without recourse to costly consultants. We need to deal with the sub-structure and re-surface the road. If we are to keep the horse trams then I believe a single track,with passing places, from the Sea Terminal to the Strathallan is all that’s required." |
Hon Christopher Charles THOMAS Esq MHK | "Definitely not on the walkway and ideally along the middle of the road the whole length of the promenade." | n/a |
What they said in Keys:
Member | July 2016 |
---|---|
Hon Christopher Charles THOMAS Esq MHK | Did not speak |
December 2016 | |
Hon Christopher Charles THOMAS Esq MHK |
The Minister for Policy and Reform (Mr Thomas): Thank you very much, Mr President. I want to, first of all, associate myself with the excellent remarks made by Minister Cregeen and Mr Turner in respect of the validity of previous Tynwald resolutions and the ability of this Government and this Court to actually start afresh and take a new approach, where necessary. Every one of the Tynwald policy resolutions from the last administration is being taken into account as we put our programme out for Government, but they are what they are: they are Tynwald resolutions and, we hope, in January, we will be adopting a new Programme for Government. The second point I wanted to make is, again, to associate myself with Minister Cregeen and 3350 Mrs Beecroft and the Minister, which is that I am fully behind the motion, as brought. I want to congratulate the Minister, for similar reasons that many other people have made, which is that he is grasping the nettle, he is trying to go about this the right way, which is to get us to agree principles before coming forward with the funding motion to actually start on this work, which we all recognise needs to be done.
Finally, this is an appeal to the people out there who care about the heritage, quite rightly, and who want to preserve and to conserve it, but it takes more than just objecting to political activity to preserve something; it actually takes more than that. It should be about coming up with positive proposals for how the governance should be improved. It comes up with working with the Department in Government to actual finance the improvements. So, everybody who is listening, who cares, like I do – and I know like the Minister does – about conserving our heritage in every one of its dimensions, we actually now need to have action and we need to have funded actions and we need to have proper governance arrangements. A couple of years ago, Minister Beecroft, I think, took part in working groups about how the 3385 governance of all the heritage transport could be organised and that work has been ongoing, I believe, but I have not seen the results as yet. That was something else that was part of the July 2016 resolution, so I really do hope that people outside seize the nettle and come back to us with positive proposals. |
Catherine Ann CORLETT MHK |
Did not speak |